President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Rom

176 Misc. 200, 25 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2602
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 5, 1940·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Hooley, J.

The procedure herein was proper. If it was intended that section 290 of the Civil Practice Act should apply only in the case of the taking of the deposition of adverse parties, specific provision to that effect would have been inserted therein. However, as the section now reads, particularly when considered with section 299 of the Civil Practice Act, its meaning is clear. In so far as the merits are concerned, the plaintiff is entitled to the examination herein sought. The witness will undoubtedly be hostile and hence special circumstances are present. (La Bonte v. Long Island, Railroad Co., 242 App. Div. 844.)

Motion to vacate denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Rom, 176 Misc. 200, 25 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2602 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1940).

176 Misc. 200 (President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Rom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Happell v. Genoese
35 Misc. 2d 939 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Kagan v. Gair
14 Misc. 2d 538 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
President of the Manhattan Co. v. Rom
261 A.D. 841 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)