President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Rom

176 Misc. 200, 25 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2602
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 5, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 176 Misc. 200 (President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Rom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Rom, 176 Misc. 200, 25 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2602 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1940).

Opinion

Hooley, J.

The procedure herein was proper. If it was intended that section 290 of the Civil Practice Act should apply only in the case of the taking of the deposition of adverse parties, specific provision to that effect would have been inserted therein. However, as the section now reads, particularly when considered with section 299 of the Civil Practice Act, its meaning is clear. In so far as the merits are concerned, the plaintiff is entitled to the examination herein sought. The witness will undoubtedly be hostile and hence special circumstances are present. (La Bonte v. Long Island, Railroad Co., 242 App. Div. 844.)

Motion to vacate denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Happell v. Genoese
35 Misc. 2d 939 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Kagan v. Gair
14 Misc. 2d 538 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
President of the Manhattan Co. v. Rom
261 A.D. 841 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 Misc. 200, 25 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/president-directors-of-manhattan-co-v-rom-nysupct-1940.