President, Directors, & Co. v. Chamberlin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

President, Directors, & Co. v. Chamberlin

15 Mass. 220

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1818

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 15 Mass. 220 (President, Directors, & Co. v. Chamberlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

President, Directors, & Co. v. Chamberlin, 15 Mass. 220 (Mass. 1818).

Pincite

Opinion

But the Court agreed in opinion, with the judge who sat at the trial, that the deed of the infant to the demandants was voidable only. The deed to the tenants was a recognition of it, and made it good and effectual. The cases from New York were different. The second deed in this case was a confirmation of the former one, and nod no operation to avoid it. Let judgment be entered for the demandants, as on mortgage.

Gold for the demandants,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

But the Court agreed in opinion, with the judge who sat at the trial, that the deed of the infant to the demandants was voidable only. The deed to the tenants was a recognition of it, and made it good and effectual. The cases from New York were different. The second deed in this case was a confirmation of the former one, and nod no operation to avoid it. Let judgment be entered for the demandants, as on mortgage.

Gold for the demandants,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Mass. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/president-directors-co-v-chamberlin-mass-1818.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack