President, Directors & Co. of the Bank of Auburn v. Aikin
Opinion
No doubt the plea was put in for delay $ but we cannot say that the defendant had no right to plead such a plea. But the replication was bad. The plaintiffs ought to have replied specially, and shown how they were a corporation; for the act by which they are incorporated, requires certain things to be done before they can be a corporation. It is not necessary, actually, to strike out the similiter; the demurrer is a sufficient notice for that purpose. (Col. Cases, 46.) The motion of the defendants must be granted, with costs, but the plaintiffs have leave to amend their replication.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
18 Johns. 137 (President, Directors & Co. of the Bank of Auburn v. Aikin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.