President, Directors & Co. of the Bank of Auburn v. Aikin

18 Johns. 137
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1820·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

No doubt the plea was put in for delay $ but we cannot say that the defendant had no right to plead such a plea. But the replication was bad. The plaintiffs ought to have replied specially, and shown how they were a corporation; for the act by which they are incorporated, requires certain things to be done before they can be a corporation. It is not necessary, actually, to strike out the similiter; the demurrer is a sufficient notice for that purpose. (Col. Cases, 46.) The motion of the defendants must be granted, with costs, but the plaintiffs have leave to amend their replication.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

President, Directors & Co. of the Bank of Auburn v. Aikin, 18 Johns. 137 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1820).

18 Johns. 137 (President, Directors & Co. of the Bank of Auburn v. Aikin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Attorney General v. Lee
21 Ohio St. (N.S.) 662 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1871)
Griffin v. Clinton Line Extension R.
11 F. Cas. 27 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio, 1858)
Commercial Bank v. State
12 Miss. 439 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1845)