President & Commissioners of Port Deposit v. Public Service Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

President & Commissioners of Port Deposit v. Public Service Commission

141 A. 517, 155 Md. 124, 1928 Md. LEXIS 108

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedApril 13, 1928

Docket[No. 64, January Term, 1928.]

StatusPublished

This text of 141 A. 517 (President & Commissioners of Port Deposit v. Public Service Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

President & Commissioners of Port Deposit v. Public Service Commission, 141 A. 517, 155 Md. 124, 1928 Md. LEXIS 108 (Md. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

OmniTT, L,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellant in this ease filed its bill of complaint against the appellee in Circuit Court Mo. 2 of Baltimore City to have it review and reverse an order of the Public 'Service Commission of Maryland, which granted permission to the appellee to relocate its railroad tracks between Tome Institute Station in Port Deposit, Maryland, and a point south of the Octarora Bridge at a grade of .38 per cent. The facts and the issues involved are the same as those presented by the appeal in Mo. 63, January Term, on the' docket of this court, and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case we concur in the decree passed by the trial court, and it will be affirmed.

Decree affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OmniTT, L,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellant in this ease filed its bill of complaint against the appellee in Circuit Court Mo. 2 of Baltimore City to have it review and reverse an order of the Public 'Service Commission of Maryland, which granted permission to the appellee to relocate its railroad tracks between Tome Institute Station in Port Deposit, Maryland, and a point south of the Octarora Bridge at a grade of .38 per cent. The facts and the issues involved are the same as those presented by the appeal in Mo. 63, January Term, on the' docket of this court, and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case we concur in the decree passed by the trial court, and it will be affirmed.

Decree affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 A. 517, 155 Md. 124, 1928 Md. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/president-commissioners-of-port-deposit-v-public-service-commission-md-1928.