Presecan v. Hiatt

Third Circuit

Presecan v. Hiatt

135 F.2d 884, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3442

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 18, 1943

DocketNo. 8280

StatusPublished

This text of 135 F.2d 884 (Presecan v. Hiatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Presecan v. Hiatt, 135 F.2d 884, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3442 (3d Cir. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a full and fair hearing the court below found that “none of the court officials, or other persons included within the blanket allegation of the petitioner, made any promises or coerced or induced or encouraged or brought about the defendant’s * * * plea of guilty.” This finding, which is fully supported by the evidence, effectively disposes of the basis assigned by the petitioner in applying for a writ of habeas corpus. The order of the District Court denying the petition and dismissing the writ is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After a full and fair hearing the court below found that “none of the court officials, or other persons included within the blanket allegation of the petitioner, made any promises or coerced or induced or encouraged or brought about the defendant’s * * * plea of guilty.” This finding, which is fully supported by the evidence, effectively disposes of the basis assigned by the petitioner in applying for a writ of habeas corpus. The order of the District Court denying the petition and dismissing the writ is accordingly affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 F.2d 884, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/presecan-v-hiatt-ca3-1943.