Prescott v. Tufts

4 Mass. 146
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1808·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

The action was continued nisi for the decision of this motion ; and now the opinion of the Court was delivered as follows by

Parsons, C. J.

The statute giving the treble damages originally demanded by the plaintiff in a second count, directs that they may be recovered after the same manner of * con- [ * 147 J viction, and by the same rules and methods, as are directed in the provincial statute of 12 Geo. c. 5. Looking into that statute, we find the manner of conviction there described is in cases where the defendant shall be charged in trespass. Trespass is therefore the proper action for recovering the treble damages here de manded, and the defendant’s objection is unsupported.

It is holden in some cases, where there is a misjoinder of action, a verdict of a jury, finding the issue for the defendant on the count misjoined, will not cure the declaration, so that the plaintiff can have judgment on the count, on which a verdict is found for him. Whether this is now law, it is not necessary to determine ; for we are satisfied that when a count is struck out of the declaration by leave of the Court, the declaration must afterwards be considered as if the count struck out had never been introduced. Judgment cannot be arrested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prescott v. Tufts, 4 Mass. 146 (Mass. 1808).

4 Mass. 146 (Prescott v. Tufts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Miguel Cordova.
Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2026
Gallagher v. Wheeler
198 N.E. 891 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Carter v. Manhattan Life Insurance
11 Haw. 69 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1897)
Hartshorn v. Schoff
51 N.H. 316 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1871)
Fernald v. Garvin
55 Me. 414 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1867)
Homstead v. Loomis
53 Me. 549 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1866)
Lamphier v. Worcester & Nashua Railroad
33 N.H. 495 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1856)
Griswold v. Miller
15 Barb. 520 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)
Sumner v. Cummings
23 Vt. 427 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1851)
Gaveny v. Hinton
2 Greene 344 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1849)
Baldwin v. Gregg
54 Mass. 253 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1847)
Fairfield v. Burt
28 Mass. 245 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1830)
Commonwealth v. M'Donald
16 Serg. & Rawle 390 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1827)
Jackson ex dem. Erwin v. Moore
6 Cow. 706 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)