Prescott v. State

726 S.E.2d 599, 315 Ga. App. 67, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 1299, 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 315
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Prescott v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 309 Ga. App. 541
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 22, 2012·No. A11A0695·Published

Opinion

McFADDEN, Judge.

In Prescott v. State, 309 Ga. App. 541 (710 SE2d 672) (2011), we reversed Richard Jerome Prescott’s child molestation conviction. In Division 1 of the opinion, we held that competent testimony proved the victim’s age, but in Division 2, we held that the state failed to prove venue. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and, in State v. Prescott, 290 Ga. 528 (722 SE2d 738) (2012), reversed our judgment, holding that the evidence, albeit circumstantial, was sufficient to prove venue beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, Division 2 of our opinion and our judgment in Prescott, 309 Ga. App. 541, is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court, and Prescott’s conviction is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Phipps, P. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prescott v. State, 726 S.E.2d 599, 315 Ga. App. 67, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 1299, 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 315 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).

726 S.E.2d 599 (Prescott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prescott v. State
710 S.E.2d 672 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
State v. Prescott
722 S.E.2d 738 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)