Prescott v. Prescott, No. Fa 01 0185436 S (Sep. 25, 2001)

2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 13426, 30 Conn. L. Rptr. 443
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedSeptember 25, 2001
DocketNo. FA 01 0185436 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 13426 (Prescott v. Prescott, No. Fa 01 0185436 S (Sep. 25, 2001)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prescott v. Prescott, No. Fa 01 0185436 S (Sep. 25, 2001), 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 13426, 30 Conn. L. Rptr. 443 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION de PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DISQUALIFY (103)
The attorney for the defendant recently represented both parties in the filing of a joint Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Petition. They obtained a discharge.

Applying the various tests discussed in Bergeron v. Mackler,225 Conn. 391 (1993), this court does not find that the prior representation of plaintiff by defendant's present attorney would compromise any confidential information. There was an obligation to reveal all assets and liabilities to the bankruptcy court and a similar obligation exists in every dissolution case, Billington v. Billington,220 Conn. 212 (1991).

The motion is denied.

Harrigan, J.T.R.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Billington v. Billington
595 A.2d 1377 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)
Bergeron v. Mackler
623 A.2d 489 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 13426, 30 Conn. L. Rptr. 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prescott-v-prescott-no-fa-01-0185436-s-sep-25-2001-connsuperct-2001.