Prescott v. Prescott, No. Fa 01 0185436 S (Sep. 25, 2001)

2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 13426, 30 Conn. L. Rptr. 443
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided September 25, 2001·No. No. FA 01 0185436 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION de PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DISQUALIFY (103)
The attorney for the defendant recently represented both parties in the filing of a joint Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Petition. They obtained a discharge.

Applying the various tests discussed in Bergeron v. Mackler,225 Conn. 391 (1993), this court does not find that the prior representation of plaintiff by defendant's present attorney would compromise any confidential information. There was an obligation to reveal all assets and liabilities to the bankruptcy court and a similar obligation exists in every dissolution case, Billington v. Billington,220 Conn. 212 (1991).

The motion is denied.

Harrigan, J.T.R.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prescott v. Prescott, No. Fa 01 0185436 S (Sep. 25, 2001), 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 13426, 30 Conn. L. Rptr. 443 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001).

2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 13426 (Prescott v. Prescott, No. Fa 01 0185436 S (Sep. 25, 2001)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Billington v. Billington
595 A.2d 1377 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)
Bergeron v. Mackler
623 A.2d 489 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)