Prescott v. Parker

4 Mass. 170
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1808
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 4 Mass. 170 (Prescott v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prescott v. Parker, 4 Mass. 170 (Mass. 1808).

Opinion

It is admitted that the judgment has been thus satisfied, unless Parker is liable by law to pay interest on that judgment until it was satisfied.

Interest is allowed m. an action of debt on judgment, as the [156]*156measure of damages for unjustly detaining the debt. In this case, he was obliged by law to detain the debt from Gilson; and therefore he cannot be answerable to the attaching creditors for damages for the detention. Consequently Parker, having fully satisfied the judgment recovered by Gilson, had no effects of his in his hands for the benefit of the plaintiff, who, unfortunately, was, in order of time, the last attaching creditor. Parker must now be discharged ; but he is not entitled to costs, because he did not come in at the first term, and submit himself to an examination pursuant to the statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moscow Fire Insurance Co. of Moscow v. Heckscher & Gottlieb
260 A.D. 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Stephens v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.
97 N.W. 686 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1903)
Hamill v. Peck
11 Colo. App. 1 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1898)
Haight v. Pine
10 A.D. 470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Cross v. Brown, Steese & Clarke
33 A. 147 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1895)
Bridges v. Sheldon
7 F. 17 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1880)
Everett v. Bolles
6 Haw. 153 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1875)
Lash v. Lambert
15 Minn. 416 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1870)
Wheelock v. . Tanner
39 N.Y. 481 (New York Court of Appeals, 1868)
Blair & Hunt v. Porter
13 N.J. Eq. 267 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1861)
Candee ex rel. Marsh v. Webster
9 Ohio St. (N.S.) 452 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1859)
Norton v. Winter
1 Or. 47 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1853)
Swamscot Machine Co. v. Partridge
25 N.H. 369 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1852)
Shinn v. Zimmerman
23 N.J.L. 150 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1851)
Trowbridge & Jennings v. Means
5 Ark. 135 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1843)
President, Directors of Oriental Bank v. Tremont Insurance
45 Mass. 1 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1842)
Crawford v. Executors of Simonton
7 Port. 110 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1838)
Gager v. Watson
11 Conn. 168 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1836)
Stevens v. Barringer
13 Wend. 639 (New York Supreme Court, 1835)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Mass. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prescott-v-parker-mass-1808.