Prescott v. Lovett

239 So. 2d 606
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 1970·No. No. 69-42·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an unauthorized autopsy case which was brought by the decedent’s mother against a pathologist, a hospital and a Justice of the Peace. The complaint was dismissed for failure to state a cause of action upon the defendants’ motions. The mother appeals. We reverse.

We have minutely examined the allegations of the complaint, mindful that its well pleaded allegations are to be taken as true. Based upon this restricted examination, we feel that the trial court was in error. We reach this decision in the light of the new authority of Jackson v. Rupp, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 916, decided subsequent to the issuance of the order herein appealed. We are satisfied and say no more than the complaint was adequate to withstand the motions and record that no real purpose would be served in reproducing and dissecting the complaint in this opinion.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate the complaint.

Reversed.

WALDEN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prescott v. Lovett, 239 So. 2d 606 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

239 So. 2d 606 (Prescott v. Lovett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirker v. Orange County
519 So. 2d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Walker v. State
240 So. 2d 646 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)