Prescott v. Edmondson

179 S.E. 107, 180 Ga. 462, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 441
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 12, 1935
DocketNo. 10426
StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.E. 107 (Prescott v. Edmondson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prescott v. Edmondson, 179 S.E. 107, 180 Ga. 462, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 441 (Ga. 1935).

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

1. Where the testimony as to material facts on an application for alimony is conflicting, and there is enough to support the finding of the court below, this court will not interfere with its discretion. Glass v. Wynn, 76 Ga. 319; Heaton v. Heaton, 102 Ga. 578 (27 S. E. 677) ; Kelly v. Kelly, 146 Ga. 362 (91 S. E. 120).

2. There appears in the instant case a conflict as to the age of the defendant, and as to whether he was able to contract marriage; and this being a writ of error to a grant of temporary alimony and attorney’s fees, the judgment will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All Hie Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glass v. Wynn
76 Ga. 319 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1886)
Heaton v. Heaton
27 S.E. 677 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Kelly v. Kelly
91 S.E. 120 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 S.E. 107, 180 Ga. 462, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prescott-v-edmondson-ga-1935.