Prentis Coleman v. the State of Texas
This text of Prentis Coleman v. the State of Texas (Prentis Coleman v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-21-00074-CR; 13-21-00075-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
PRENTIS COLEMAN, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva
These causes are before the court on appellant’s motions to dismiss these appeals
which indicate appellant no longer desires to prosecute these appeals. The motions were
each signed by both counsel and the appellant. We find the motions meet the requirement
of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) that appellant and attorney must sign a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the
merits of the cases, we grant the motions to dismiss and dismiss the appeals.
CLARISSA SILVA Justice
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 8th day of July, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Prentis Coleman v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prentis-coleman-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.