Prentice v. Sommer
121 A.D. 900, 105 N.Y.S. 1139
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1907
StatusPublished
This text of 121 A.D. 900 (Prentice v. Sommer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Prentice v. Sommer, 121 A.D. 900, 105 N.Y.S. 1139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
Opinion
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed on the ground that the "testimony for the plaintiff at the close of the case did not permit a dismissal of his complaint. A new trial-is ordered, costs to abide the event. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and "Rich, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
121 A.D. 900, 105 N.Y.S. 1139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prentice-v-sommer-nyappdiv-1907.