Prentice v. Madden
3 Pin. 376, 4 Chand. 170
This text of 3 Pin. 376 (Prentice v. Madden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Prentice v. Madden, 3 Pin. 376, 4 Chand. 170 (Wis. 1851).
Opinion
The decree in this cause must be affirmed. The judgment against Madden was an individual judgment, and as such, bound only his individual property. It however held his interest in the trust property. But the bill does not charge Madden with any fraud in confessing judgment, but only a design to hinder and delay his creditors. The final averment of fraud is only a conclusion of law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Pin. 376, 4 Chand. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prentice-v-madden-wis-1851.