Prentice-Hall, Inc. v. Superior Court
This text of 345 P.2d 527 (Prentice-Hall, Inc. v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition of Prentice-Hall for writ of prohibition to restrain the superior court from proceeding further upon the indictment returned against it raises the same factual matters and issues as have been previously discussed in the decisions in Davis v. Superior Court, No. 18759, ante, p. 8 [345 P.2d 513], and Longstreth v. Superior Court, No. 18760, ante, p. 27 [345 P.2d 525] decided this day.
For the reasons stated in those opinions, we have concluded that the indictment fails.
Let a peremptory writ of prohibition issue.
Bray, P. J., and Wood (Fred B.), J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing was denied November 25, 1959, and the petition of the Real Party in Interest for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied December 23, 1959.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
345 P.2d 527, 175 Cal. App. 2d 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prentice-hall-inc-v-superior-court-calctapp-1959.