Home/California Court of Appeal/Prentice-Hall, Inc. v. Superior Court

Prentice-Hall, Inc. v. Superior Court

345 P.2d 527, 175 Cal. App. 2d 903
California Court of Appeal·Decided October 30, 1959·No. Civ. No. 18762·Published

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

The petition of Prentice-Hall for writ of prohibition to restrain the superior court from proceeding further upon the indictment returned against it raises the same factual matters and issues as have been previously discussed in the decisions in Davis v. Superior Court, No. 18759, ante, p. 8 [345 P.2d 513], and Longstreth v. Superior Court, No. 18760, ante, p. 27 [345 P.2d 525] decided this day.

For the reasons stated in those opinions, we have concluded that the indictment fails.

Let a peremptory writ of prohibition issue.

Bray, P. J., and Wood (Fred B.), J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied November 25, 1959, and the petition of the Real Party in Interest for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied December 23, 1959.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prentice-Hall, Inc. v. Superior Court, 345 P.2d 527, 175 Cal. App. 2d 903 (Cal. Ct. App. 1959).

345 P.2d 527 (Prentice-Hall, Inc. v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Superior Court
345 P.2d 513 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
Longstreth v. Superior Court
345 P.2d 525 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)