Prendergast v. Prendergast

212 A.D.2d 764, 624 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2209

Opinion

—In an action for divorce, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 21, 1993, which granted the plaintiff a divorce upon an open-court stipulation of settlement.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appeal from the judgment must be dismissed because a party may not appeal from an order or judgment entered upon a stipulation (see, Hagfors v Hagfors, 200 AD2d 873, 874; Kalra v Kalra, 170 AD2d 579; Hopkins v Hopkins, 97 AD2d 457). The defendant’s proper remedy concerning the propriety of the parties’ settlement agreement is a motion in the Supreme Court to set aside the stipulation (see, Hagfors v Hag[765]*765fors, supra; Hopkins v Hopkins, supra). Pizzuto, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prendergast v. Prendergast, 212 A.D.2d 764, 624 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2209 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

212 A.D.2d 764 (Prendergast v. Prendergast) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hopkins v. Hopkins
97 A.D.2d 457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Kalra v. Kalra
170 A.D.2d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Hagfors v. Hagfors
200 A.D.2d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)