Prendergast v. City of Reno

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedApril 9, 2025
Docket3:24-cv-00491
StatusUnknown

This text of Prendergast v. City of Reno (Prendergast v. City of Reno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prendergast v. City of Reno, (D. Nev. 2025).

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2 3 4 KALLI PRENDERGAST, an individual, CASE NO.: 3:24-cv-00491-MMD-CSD 5 Plaintiff, 6 vs. ORDER GRANTING 7 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CITY OF RENO, NEVADA; ERIC 8 HAGUE, an individual; WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA; SHELLY L. 9 TONE, an individual; and DOES 1-10, 10 inclusive Defendants. / 11 In order to protect the confidentiality of confidential information obtained by the 12 parties in connection with this case, the parties hereby agree as follows: 13 1. Any party or non-party may designate as "confidential" (by stamping the relevant page 14 or other otherwise set forth herein) any document or response to discovery which that 15 party or non-party considers in good faith to contain information involving trade 16 secrets, or confidential business or financial information, subject to protection under 17 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Nevada law ("Confidential Information"). 18 Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and each 19 page on which confidential information appears shall be so designated. 20 2. A party or non-party may designate information disclosed during a deposition or in 21 response to written discovery as "confidential" by so indicating in said response or on 22 the record at the deposition and requesting the preparation of a separate transcript of 23 such material. Additionally a party or non-party may designate in writing, within twenty 24 (20) days after receipt of said responses or of the deposition transcript for which the 25 designation is proposed, that specific pages of the transcript and/or specific responses 26 be treated as "confidential" information. Any other party may object to such proposal, 27 in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the parties shall follow the procedures 28 described in paragraph 8 below. After any designation made according to the procedure Reno City Attorney 1 set forth in this paragraph, the designated documents or information shall be treated 2 according to the designation until the matter is resolved according to the procedures 3 described in paragraph 8 below, and counsel for all parties shall be responsible for 4 making all previously unmarked copies of the designated material in their possession or 5 control with the specified designation. 6 3. Information, documents or things which are produced or disclosed by electronic 7 means may be designated “confidential” by so indicating in writing as described in 8 section 2, above. The parties shall have thirty (30) days from the date this Protective 9 Order is entered to so designate information, documents or things which were 10 produced prior to the entry of this Order. 11 4. All information produced or exchanged in the course of this case (other than 12 information that is publicly available) shall be used by the party or parties to whom 13 the information is produced solely for the purpose of this case. 14 5. Except with the prior written consent of other parties, or upon prior order of this Court 15 obtained upon notice to opposing counsel, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed 16 to any person other than: 17 (a)counsel for the respective parties to this litigation, including in-house counsel and 18 co- counsel retained for this litigation; 19 (b) employees of such counsel who need access to the information; 20 (c) individual defendants, class representatives, any officer or employee of a party, to 21 the extent deemed necessary by Counsel for the prosecution or defense of this 22 litigation; 23 (d) consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of this 24 litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the Certification 25 annexed to this Order as Exhibit "A" (which shall be retained by counsel to the party 26 so disclosing the Confidential Information and made available for inspection by 27 opposing counsel during the pendency or after the termination of the action only upon 28 good cause shown and upon order of the Court) before being shown or given any Reno City Attorney 1 Confidential Information and provided that if the party chooses a consultant or 2 expert employed by [THE CORPORATE DEFENDANT] or one of its competitors 3 (as listed on Appendix A), the party shall notify the opposing party, or designating 4 nonparty, before disclosing any Confidential Information to that individual and shall 5 give the opposing party an opportunity to move for a protective order preventing or 6 limiting such disclosure; 7 (e)any authors or recipients of the Confidential Information; 8 (f) the Court, Court personnel, and court reporters; and 9 (g)witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(e)). A witness shall sign the 10 Certification before being shown a confidential document. Confidential 11 Information may be disclosed to a witness who will not sign the Certification only 12 in a deposition at which the party who designated the Confidential Information is 13 represented or has been given notice that Confidential Information shall be 14 designated "Confidential" pursuant to paragraph 2 above. Witnesses shown 15 Confidential Information shall not be allowed to retain copies. 16 6. Any persons receiving Confidential Information shall not reveal or discuss such 17 information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except 18 as set forth herein. 19 7. Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule or prior court order, papers filed with the 20 court under seal shall be accompanied by a contemporaneous motion for leave to file 21 those documents under seal, and shall be filed consistent with the court's electronic 22 filing procedures in accordance with Local Rule IA 10-5. Notwithstanding any 23 agreement among the parties, the party seeking to file a paper under seal bears the 24 burden of overcoming the presumption in favor of public access to papers filed in 25 court. Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.2d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006); 26 Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass'n, 605 F.3d 665, 677- 78 (9th Cir. 2010). 27 8. A party may designate as "Confidential" documents or discovery materials produced 28 by a non-party by providing written notice to all parties of the relevant document Reno City Attorney 1 numbers or other identification within thirty (30) days after receiving such 2 documents or discovery materials. Any party or non-party may voluntarily disclose 3 to others without restriction any information designated by that party or non-party as 4 confidential, although a document may lose its confidential status if it is made public. 5 9. If a party contends that any material is not entitled to confidential treatment, such party 6 may at any time give written notice to the party or non-party who designated the material. 7 The party or non-party who designated the material shall have twenty-five (25) days from 8 the receipt of such written notice to apply to the Court for an order designating the material 9 as confidential. The party or non-party seeking the order has the burden of establishing 10 that the document is entitled to protection. 11 10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Prendergast v. City of Reno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prendergast-v-city-of-reno-nvd-2025.