Premo v. Cornell

434 N.E.2d 264, 55 N.Y.2d 962, 449 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3145
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 16, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 434 N.E.2d 264 (Premo v. Cornell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Premo v. Cornell, 434 N.E.2d 264, 55 N.Y.2d 962, 449 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3145 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rule of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]). Indeed, as we held in Barasch v Micucci (49 NY2d 594, 600-601), it would have been an abuse of discretion to have failed to dismiss.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gagnon v. J.S. International Shipping Corp.
8 A.D.3d 336 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Battaglia v. Hofmeister
100 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Parker v. Mack
460 N.E.2d 1316 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Eaton v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, Inc.
438 N.E.2d 1119 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 N.E.2d 264, 55 N.Y.2d 962, 449 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/premo-v-cornell-ny-1982.