Premium Star, Inc. v. U.S. Grain & Feed Ingredients, Inc. and American Rice, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 17, 2011
Docket13-11-00040-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Premium Star, Inc. v. U.S. Grain & Feed Ingredients, Inc. and American Rice, Inc. (Premium Star, Inc. v. U.S. Grain & Feed Ingredients, Inc. and American Rice, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Premium Star, Inc. v. U.S. Grain & Feed Ingredients, Inc. and American Rice, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00040-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

PREMIUM STAR, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

U. S. GRAIN & FEED INGREDIENTS, INC. AND AMERICAN RICE, INC., APPELLEES. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Montgomery County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Premium Star, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment rendered

against it in favor of appellees, U.S. Grain & Feed Ingredients, Inc. and American Rice,

Inc. On January 31, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record

in the above cause was originally due on January 5, 2011, and that the deputy district clerk, Bobbye Miller, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for

payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so

that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten

days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of

prosecution.

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 17th day of March, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Premium Star, Inc. v. U.S. Grain & Feed Ingredients, Inc. and American Rice, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/premium-star-inc-v-us-grain-feed-ingredients-inc-a-texapp-2011.