Preminger v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Preminger v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

117 A.D.2d 570, 499 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52837

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 117 A.D.2d 570 (Preminger v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Preminger v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, 117 A.D.2d 570, 499 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William A. Walsh, J.), entered on July 23, 1984, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and a new. trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, unless the plaintiff within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $850,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

After our review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Carro, J. P., Asch, Fein, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William A. Walsh, J.), entered on July 23, 1984, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and a new. trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, unless the plaintiff within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $850,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

After our review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Carro, J. P., Asch, Fein, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 A.D.2d 570, 499 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/preminger-v-manhattan-bronx-surface-transit-operating-authority-nyappdiv-1986.