Premier Valley Bank v. Nguyen

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 12, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-00900·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PREMIER VALLEY BANK, Case No. 1:20-cv-00900-NONE-EPG 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 14 HOA NGUYEN, (ECF No. 56.) 15 Defendant.

16 HOA NGUYEN, 17 Counter-Claimant, 18 v. 19 PREMIER VALLEY BANK, 20 Counter-Defendant. 21

22 On November 10, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action with 23 prejudice. (ECF No. 56.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with 24 prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 25 1997). 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to assign a district judge to 2 | this case for the purpose of closing the case and then to close this case. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. S| Dated: November 12, 2021 [spe ey □□ 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Premier Valley Bank v. Nguyen, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Premier Valley Bank v. Nguyen (Premier Valley Bank v. Nguyen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)