Premier Products Inc. v. Marjam Supply Co.

209 A.D.2d 498, 619 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11257
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 14, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to receive payment for goods sold and delivered, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutner, J.), dated August 3, 1993, as denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of forum non conveniens.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Upon our review of the relevant factors in this case, we find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of forum non conveniens (see, CPLR 327; see generally, Islamic Republic of Iran v Pahlavi, 62 NY2d 474, 478-479, cert denied 469 US 1108). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Premier Products Inc. v. Marjam Supply Co., 209 A.D.2d 498, 619 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 498 (Premier Products Inc. v. Marjam Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirkaldy v. Hertz Corporation
221 A.D.2d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)