Premier Oil Refining Co. v. United States

347 U.S. 987, 74 S. Ct. 851, 98 L. Ed. 1122, 1954 U.S. LEXIS 1998, 46 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 940
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 1, 1954·No. No. 692·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is granted [988]*988limited to the question presented by the petition for the writ which reads as follows:

W. A. Sutherland and Mac Asbill, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff for the United States.

“Where a deficiency in excess profits tax, based on the income and credits as shown in the taxpayer's return, would have existed except for the subsequent application of Section 722 of the Internal Revenue Code, is the taxpayer liable for interest on the amount of such deficiency (hereinafter called the 'potential deficiency’) which would have existed had it not been extinguished by the application of Section 722?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Premier Oil Refining Co. v. United States, 347 U.S. 987, 74 S. Ct. 851, 98 L. Ed. 1122, 1954 U.S. LEXIS 1998, 46 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 940 (1954).

347 U.S. 987 (Premier Oil Refining Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Koppers Co.
348 U.S. 254 (Supreme Court, 1955)
United States v. Koppers Co.
130 Ct. Cl. 829 (Court of Claims, 1955)