Premier Franchise Management LLC v. Poolscapes Florida, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedMarch 3, 2025
Docket6:23-cv-02364
StatusUnknown

This text of Premier Franchise Management LLC v. Poolscapes Florida, Inc. (Premier Franchise Management LLC v. Poolscapes Florida, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Premier Franchise Management LLC v. Poolscapes Florida, Inc., (M.D. Fla. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

PREMIER FRANCHISE MANAGEMENT LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 6:23-cv-2364-JSS-LHP

POOLSCAPES FLORIDA, INC., PINNACLE POOLS & SPAS CF, INC., PINNACLE POOLS & SPAS FLORIDA, INC., PINNACLE POOL COMPANY, INC., PINNACLE POOL CONSTRUCTION, INC., ANDREA N. SZAFRAN, and MATTHEW R. SZAFRAN,

Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER The parties jointly move the court to enter a stipulated permanent injunction. (Dkt. 88; see Dkts. 88-1, 88-2 (the stipulated permanent injunction and its exhibit).) In the joint motion, Plaintiff represents that entry of the injunction “resolves the injunctive relief” it seeks in its motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. 40) and amended complaint (Dkt. 29) but does not fully resolve this case because Plaintiff “may continue to seek the monetary relief sought in the [a]mended [c]omplaint.” (Dkt. 88 at 2; see Dkt. 29 at 20–24.) Upon consideration, for the reasons that follow, the court grants the joint motion (Dkt. 88), enters the stipulated permanent injunction below, and denies as moot Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. 40). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 requires “[e]very order granting an injunction” to “state the reasons why [the injunction] issued,” “state [the] terms [of the injunction] specifically,” and “describe in reasonable detail—and not by referring

to [a] complaint or other document—the act or acts restrained or required” by the injunction. Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d)(1). “The [c]ourt issues the injunction set forth below because [Defendants have] consented to its terms and because its issuance obviates the need for any further litigation regarding” the injunctive relief sought in the amended complaint. See Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. Rivers, 272 F.R.D. 607, 608 (M.D. Fla. 2011)

(citing Chathas v. Local 134 Int’l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, 233 F.3d 508, 513 (7th Cir. 2000)). “The [c]ourt additionally finds that the terms of the injunction are set forth with specificity and that the acts restrained or required are described in sufficient detail to ‘apprise those within its scope of the conduct that is being proscribed.’” See id. (quoting

Brown v. Ala. Dep’t of Transp., 597 F.3d 1160, 1185 (11th Cir. 2010)). Accordingly: 1. The parties’ joint motion (Dkt. 88) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. 40) is DENIED as moot. 3. The following stipulated permanent injunction is ENTERED:

STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court by way of a Joint Motion for Entry of a Stipulated Permanent Injunction Against Defendants, and good cause having been shown: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Poolscapes Florida, Inc. (now named Pinnacle Pool & Spa Company), Pinnacle Pools & Spas CF, Inc., Pinnacle Pools & Spas Florida, Inc., Pinnacle Pool Company, Inc., Pinnacle Pool Construction, Inc.,

Andrea N. Szafran (a/k/a Andrea Bannon), and Matthew R. Szafran (a/k/a Matthew Ross) (individually, collectively and in any combination, “Defendants”), along with all of their officers, agents, servants, employees, representatives, successors and assigns, and all those persons or entities acting in concert or participation with them, are hereby PERMANENTLY ENJOINED, jointly and severally, from using in any

manner the phrase “a passion for splashin’,” the name “Pinnacle,” the name “Pinnacle Pools & Spas,” the name “Pinnacle Pool & Spa,” the name “Premier,” the name “Premier Pools & Spas,” the name “Premier Pool & Spa,” any other registered trademark/logo of Premier Franchise Management LLC (“Premier”), or any variations thereof or any names/logos confusingly similar thereto, alone or in

combination with the logo with the white water waves design underneath and/or the surrounding blue oval design (logo attached hereto as Ex. A), including without limitation: (i) in a business name (including without limitation, “Pinnacle Pool & Spa Co.”, “Pinnacle Pool & Spa Company”, “Pinnacle Pools & Spas CF, Inc.”, “Pinnacle Pools & Spas Florida, Inc.”, “Pinnacle Pools Company, Inc.” and/or “Pinnacle Pools

Construction, Inc.”); (ii) in connection with any website (including without limitation, the website www.pinnaclepoolco.com); (iii) in connection with any email account (including without limitation, @pinnaclepoolco.com, @pinnpool.com, and @pinnpools.com ); (iv) in connection with any social media site; (v) in connection with any marketing, advertising or promotion; (vi) in connection with any telephone numbers and/or listings; (vii) in connection with any signage; and/or (viii) in connection with any pool design plans.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants, along with all of their officers, agents, servants, employees, representatives, successors and assigns, and all those persons or entities acting in concert or participation with them, shall move with all deliberate speed to accomplish all required actions of this Stipulated Permanent Injunction and, to that end, shall within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order:

1. exercise all reasonable efforts to remove in any manner, including without limitation, from all business entity names, websites, email accounts, social media sites, marketing, advertising, promotions, telephone numbers and/or listings, signage, and pool design plans the phrase “a passion for splashin’,” the name “Pinnacle,” the name “Pinnacle Pools & Spas,” the name

“Pinnacle Pool & Spa,” the name “Premier,” the name “Premier Pools & Spas,” the name “Premier Pool & Spa,” any other registered trademark/logo of Premier, or any variations thereof or any names/logos confusingly similar thereto, alone or in combination with the logo with the white water waves design underneath and/or the surrounding blue oval design (logo attached

hereto as Ex. A); and 2. exercise all reasonable efforts to cancel any assumed name or equivalent registration which includes “a passion for splashin’,” “Pinnacle,” “Pinnacle Pools & Spas,” “Pinnacle Pool & Spa,” “Premier,” “Premier Pools & Spas,” “Premier Pool & Spa,” any other registered trademark/logo of Premier, or any variations thereof or any names/logos confusingly similar thereto (including without limitation, “Pinnacle Pool & Spa Co.”, “Pinnacle Pool

& Spa Company”, “Pinnacle Pools & Spas CF, Inc.”, “Pinnacle Pools & Spas Florida, Inc.”, “Pinnacle Pools Company, Inc.” and/or “Pinnacle Pools Construction, Inc. Defendants shall notify Premier in writing within twenty (20) days from the date of this Stipulated Permanent Injunction that such items have been completed. In the

event that Premier becomes aware after the twenty-day period of any failure by Defendants to accomplish the requirements of Subparagraphs 1 and 2 of this Paragraph, Premier shall provide written notice to Defendants of such violation and Defendants shall have twenty (20) days from the date of notice to cure such failure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants, along with all of their officers,

agents, servants, employees, representatives, successors and assigns, and all those persons or entities acting in concert or participation with them, shall not at any time in the future contest in any manner Premier’s rights, title and interest in, or its use of, the phrase “a passion for splashin’,” the name “Pinnacle,” the name “Pinnacle Pools & Spas,” the name “Premier,” the name “Premier Pools & Spas,” or any other

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Alabama Department of Transportation
597 F.3d 1160 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)
Security & Exchange Commission v. Rivers
272 F.R.D. 607 (M.D. Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Premier Franchise Management LLC v. Poolscapes Florida, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/premier-franchise-management-llc-v-poolscapes-florida-inc-flmd-2025.