Premier Automation Contractors, Inc. v. Everest National Insurance Company

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PREMIER AUTOMATION No. 3:19-cv-00220-AC CONTRACTORS, INC. , Plaintiff, v.

EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE ORDER COMPANY, Defendant. HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation (#30) on December 3, 2019, in which he recommends that this Court grant Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna- Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's 1 - ORDER report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings & Recommendation [30]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's second motion for leave to amend [25] is granted. Plaintiff shall file its amended complaint within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this December 23, 2019

/V| tte Ywnuuder MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge

2 - ORDER