Premer v. State, Department of Transportation
This text of 300 So. 2d 737 (Premer v. State, Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause was tried before a jury between the time of the opinion of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Jones v. Hoffman, Fla.App. 1973, 272 So.2d 529 and the opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida in Hoffman v. Jones, Fla.1973, 280 So.2d 431, which relate to the propriety of a charge on comparative negligence.
The defendant pleaded, as affirmative defense in the trial court, contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. The plaintiff requested a charge of comparative negligence, which was denied. At the time of the giving of instructions to the jury, the trial judge instructed on contributory negligence. The plaintiff suffered an adverse jury verdict and this appeal is from a final judgment thereon.
We reverse and remand for a new trial. The issue of comparative negligence was properly made in the trial court; it has been preserved for review on appeal and, under the Supreme Court decision in Hoffman v. Jones, supra, this entitles the plaintiff to a new trial. See also: Butler v. Woolco Department Store, Fla.App.1973, 284 So.2d 434; Orfaly v. Jeffries, Fla. App.1974, 290 So.2d 575; Jones v. Flowers, Fla.App.1974, 293 So.2d 765.
Reversed and remanded for new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
300 So. 2d 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/premer-v-state-department-of-transportation-fladistctapp-1974.