Premecz v. RJHWong, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Premecz v. RJHWong, LLC

118 A.D.3d 689, 986 N.Y.S.2d 354

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 118 A.D.3d 689 (Premecz v. RJHWong, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Premecz v. RJHWong, LLC, 118 A.D.3d 689, 986 N.Y.S.2d 354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pineda-Kirwan, J.), entered January 31, 2013, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[690]*690In support of its motion for summary judgment, the defendant failed to m&ke a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a mater of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Since the defendant failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, it is not necessary to review the sufficiency of the plaintiffs opposition papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr, 64 NY2d 851 [1985]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Mastro, J.E, Skelos, Cohen and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI