Preiser v. Newkirk
419 U.S. 894, 95 S. Ct. 172
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 21, 1974·No. No. 74-107·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma [895]*895pauperis and certiorari granted. In addition to question presented by the petition, parties are directed to brief and argue question of mootness.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Preiser v. Newkirk, 419 U.S. 894, 95 S. Ct. 172 (1974).
419 U.S. 894 (Preiser v. Newkirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fridella v. Coughlin
177 A.D.2d 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Gonzales v. State
35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 854 (Court of Claims of Illinois, 1982)
Von Holden v. Chapman
87 A.D.2d 66 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Hundley v. Sielaff
407 F. Supp. 543 (N.D. Illinois, 1975)
Jones v. Manson
393 F. Supp. 1016 (D. Connecticut, 1975)
Clarence Carroll v. Allyn R. Sielaff
514 F.2d 415 (Seventh Circuit, 1975)
Rosenberg v. Preiser
388 F. Supp. 639 (S.D. New York, 1975)
Jordon v. Keve
387 F. Supp. 765 (D. Delaware, 1974)