PREFERRED MUTUAL INSURANCE v. Matrix Construction Corp.

662 So. 2d 432, 1995 WL 654467
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 8, 1995
Docket95-2339
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 662 So. 2d 432 (PREFERRED MUTUAL INSURANCE v. Matrix Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PREFERRED MUTUAL INSURANCE v. Matrix Construction Corp., 662 So. 2d 432, 1995 WL 654467 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

662 So.2d 432 (1995)

PREFERRED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York Corp., a/s/o Arthur and Anna Goldstein Hebrew Academy of South Dade, a Private School Corp., d/b/a Goldstein Hebrew Academy, and Arthur and Anna Goldstein Hebrew Academy of South Dade, a Private School Corporation d/b/a Goldstein Hebrew Academy, Individually, Appellants,
v.
MATRIX CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Florida corporation, Wolfberg/Alvarez and Associates, Inc., a Florida Corporation f/k/a Wolfberg, Alvarez, Terracido and Assocs., Rocky and Angie Enterprises, Inc., a Florida Corporation f/k/a Stanley Roofing Co., Inc., and American testing and Engineering Corp., an Indiana Corp. d/b/a Atec Associates, Inc., Jointly and Severally, Appellees.

No. 95-2339.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 8, 1995.

Jay M. Levy; Riley & Knoerr and Sheri L. Critelli, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellants.

Schreiber, Rodon-Alvarez and Gerhardt Schreiber, Coral Gables, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse a trial court's order referring a matter to arbitration, finding that the appellees waived the right to arbitrate by seeking the benefits of discovery rules prior to filing their motion to arbitrate. Hardin Int'l, Inc. v. Firepak, Inc., 567 So.2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Rolls v. Bliss & Nyitray, Inc., 408 So.2d 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), appeal dismissed 415 So.2d 1359 (Fla. 1982); Winter v. Arvida Corp., 404 So.2d 829 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Therefore, the matter is returned to the trial court for further proceedings therein.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DONE AND DONE, LLC, etc. v. DATA PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC., etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. McLeod
15 So. 3d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Orlanis v. Oakwood Terrace Skilled Nursing
971 So. 2d 811 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Gray Mart, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Ins.
703 So. 2d 1170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
662 So. 2d 432, 1995 WL 654467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/preferred-mutual-insurance-v-matrix-construction-corp-fladistctapp-1995.