Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Eng. Group, Inc.
847 N.E.2d 1224, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1478
Opinion
Summit App. Nos. 22475, 22476, 22477, 22478, 22485, 22486, 22487, 22488, 22489, 22497, 22499, 22506 and 22513,163 Ohio App.3d 522, 2005-Ohio-5113. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Geoffrey G. Why by Victoria Barto for amicus curiae Attorney General of Massachusetts. Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Eng. Group, Inc., 847 N.E.2d 1224, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1478 (Ohio 2006).
847 N.E.2d 1224 (Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Eng. Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Engineering Group, Inc.
163 Ohio App. 3d 522 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)