Preetorius v. Dulgov

N.D. California

Preetorius v. Dulgov

DecidedJune 28, 2024

Docket3:24-cv-00366

StatusUnknown

This text of Preetorius v. Dulgov (Preetorius v. Dulgov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Preetorius v. Dulgov, (N.D. Cal. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 REGINA MARIE PREETORIUS, Case No. 24-cv-00366-AMO (PR) 7 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY 8 v. DISMISSAL 9 A. DULGOV, Re: Dkt. No. 7 10 Respondent. 11 Before the Court is Petitioner Regina Marie Preetorius’s request for voluntary dismissal. 12 || See Dkt. 7. She “request[s] that [this action] be voluntarily dismissed without prejudice due to no 5 13 || longer residing in the court’s jurisdiction.” Jd. at 1. 14 Pursuant to the request for voluntary dismissal of this action filed by Preetorius, this action 3 15 is DISMISSED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1); Hamilton v. Shearson-Lehman American Exp. Inc., a 16 813 F.2d 1532, 1534-36 (9th Cir. 1987) (Rule 41(a)(1)(A)G) does not require leave of court to 3 17 dismiss the action). The dismissal is without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) (unless the S 18 || notice of dismissal states otherwise, it is deemed to be “without prejudice”); Humphreys v. United 19 || States, 272 F.2d 411, 412 (9th Cir. 1959). 20 CONCLUSION 21 Accordingly, Preetorius’s request for voluntary dismissal is GRANTED. Dkt. 7. The 22 || petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. 23 The Clerk of the Court shall close the file. 24 This Order terminates Docket No. 7. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 || Dated: June 28, 2024 □ mn Qaacebe □□□ ARACELI MARTINEZ-OLGUIN 28 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 REGINA MARIE PREETORIUS, Case No. 24-cv-00366-AMO (PR) 7 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY 8 v. DISMISSAL 9 A. DULGOV, Re: Dkt. No. 7 10 Respondent. 11 Before the Court is Petitioner Regina Marie Preetorius’s request for voluntary dismissal. 12 || See Dkt. 7. She “request[s] that [this action] be voluntarily dismissed without prejudice due to no 5 13 || longer residing in the court’s jurisdiction.” Jd. at 1. 14 Pursuant to the request for voluntary dismissal of this action filed by Preetorius, this action 3 15 is DISMISSED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1); Hamilton v. Shearson-Lehman American Exp. Inc., a 16 813 F.2d 1532, 1534-36 (9th Cir. 1987) (Rule 41(a)(1)(A)G) does not require leave of court to 3 17 dismiss the action). The dismissal is without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) (unless the S 18 || notice of dismissal states otherwise, it is deemed to be “without prejudice”); Humphreys v. United 19 || States, 272 F.2d 411, 412 (9th Cir. 1959). 20 CONCLUSION 21 Accordingly, Preetorius’s request for voluntary dismissal is GRANTED. Dkt. 7. The 22 || petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. 23 The Clerk of the Court shall close the file. 24 This Order terminates Docket No. 7. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 || Dated: June 28, 2024 □ mn Qaacebe □□□ ARACELI MARTINEZ-OLGUIN 28 United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Preetorius v. Dulgov, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/preetorius-v-dulgov-cand-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack