Precourt v. Kyanka

572 N.E.2d 48, 77 N.Y.2d 936, 569 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 470
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 4, 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 572 N.E.2d 48 (Precourt v. Kyanka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Precourt v. Kyanka, 572 N.E.2d 48, 77 N.Y.2d 936, 569 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 470 (N.Y. 1991).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the movant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).

Judge Titone taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 N.E.2d 48, 77 N.Y.2d 936, 569 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/precourt-v-kyanka-ny-1991.