Precision Traffic Counting, Inc. v. Harlis R. Ellington Construction, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Precision Traffic Counting, Inc. v. Harlis R. Ellington Construction, Inc.

912 So. 2d 612, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12194

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 4, 2005·No. Nos. 1D03-2465, 1D03-4115, 1D03-4223, 1D03-4537·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellees were the prevailing parties, and because we are unable to discern from the record the trial court’s rationale for disallowing appellees’ request for costs in the amount of $8,856 .13 for the expert testimony of Cloyce Darnell, we reverse the trial court’s order on appellees’ motion for costs and remand with directions to grant appellees an additional $8,856.13. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED with directions to grant appellees an additional $8,856.13 in costs.

DAVIS, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellees were the prevailing parties, and because we are unable to discern from the record the trial court’s rationale for disallowing appellees’ request for costs in the amount of $8,856 .13 for the expert testimony of Cloyce Darnell, we reverse the trial court’s order on appellees’ motion for costs and remand with directions to grant appellees an additional $8,856.13. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED with directions to grant appellees an additional $8,856.13 in costs.

DAVIS, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Precision Traffic Counting, Inc. v. Harlis R. Ellington Construction, Inc., 912 So. 2d 612, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12194 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

912 So. 2d 612 (Precision Traffic Counting, Inc. v. Harlis R. Ellington Construction, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related