Precision Medicine Group, LLC v. Blue Matter, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedOctober 15, 2020
Docket1:20-cv-02974
StatusUnknown

This text of Precision Medicine Group, LLC v. Blue Matter, LLC (Precision Medicine Group, LLC v. Blue Matter, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Precision Medicine Group, LLC v. Blue Matter, LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PRECISION MEDICINE GROUP, LLC, PRECISIONADVISORS GROUP, INC., and PRECISION MEDICINE GROUP Protective Order HOLDINGS, INC., Case No: 1:20-cv-02974 (PGG) Plaintiffs, v. BLUE MATTER, LLC, NAINA AHMAD, JOSE JAUREGUI, and MRIDUL MALHOTRA, Defendants. PAUL G. GARDEPHE, U.S.D.J.: WHEREAS, the parties to this action (collectively the “Parties” and individually a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of certain nonpublic and confidential material that will be exchanged pursuant to and during the course of discovery in this case; WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge that this Protective Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords only

extends to the limited information or items that are entitled, under the applicable legal principles, to confidential treatment; WHEREAS, the Parties further acknowledge that this Protective Order does not create entitlement to file confidential information under seal; and WHEREAS, in light of these acknowledgements, and based on the representations of the Parties that discovery in this case will involve confidential documents or information the public disclosure of which will cause harm to the producing person and/or third party to whom a duty of confidentiality is owed, and to protect against injury caused by dissemination of confidential documents and information, this Court finds good cause for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action; for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order

governing the pretrial phase of this action; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any person subject to this Protective Order – including without limitation the Parties to this action, their representatives, agents, experts and consultants, all third parties providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with actual or constructive notice of this Protective Order — shall adhere to the following terms: 1. Any person subject to this Protective Order who receives from any other person subject to this Protective Order any “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind produced or disclosed pursuant to and in course of discovery in this action) that is designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to the terms of this

Protective Order (hereinafter “Confidential Discovery Material” and Highly Confidential Discovery Material,” respectively) shall not disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone except as expressly permitted hereunder. 2. The person producing any given Discovery Material may designate as Confidential only such portion of such material the public disclosure of which is either restricted by law or will cause harm to the business, commercial, financial or personal interests of the producing person and/or a third party to whom a duty of confidentiality is used and that consists of: (a) previously non-disclosed financial information (including without limitation profitability reports or estimates, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum guarantee payments, sales reports, and sale margins); (b) previously non-disclosed material relating to ownership or control of any non- public company;

(c) previously non-disclosed business plans, product-development information, or marketing plans; (d) any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual; or (e) any other category of information hereinafter given confidential status by the Court. 3. The person producing any given Discovery Material may designate as Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only only such portion of such material the public disclosure of which is either restricted by law or will cause harm to the business, commercial, financial or personal interests of the producing person and/or a third party to whom a duty of confidentiality

is used and that consists of: (a) previously nondisclosed financial information (including without limitation profitability reports or estimates, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum guarantee payments, sales reports, and sale margins); (b) previously nondisclosed technical information or trade secrets; or (c) any other category of information hereinafter given highly confidential – attorneys’ eyes only status by the Court. 4. With respect to the Confidential or Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the producing person or that person’s counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” by stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility. 5. With respect to deposition transcripts, a producing person or that person’s counsel

may designate such portion as Confidential or Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only either by (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential or Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony (consisting of question and answer) in a separate volume and mark it as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order” or “Highly Confidential –Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information Governed by Protective Order”; or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within 14 calendar days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript and/or the specific exhibits that are to be designated Confidential or Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only, in which case all counsel receiving

the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript or exhibit (as the case may be), in their possession or under their control as directed by the producing person or that person’s counsel by the reporter. During the 14-calendar day period following the conclusion of a deposition, the entire deposition transcript will be treated as if it had been designated Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only. 6. If at any time prior to the trial of this action a producing person realizes that some portion(s) of Discovery Material that she, he or it had previously produced without limitation, should be designated as Confidential or Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only, she, he, or it may so designate by so apprising all prior recipients of the Discovery Material in writing, and thereafter such designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material will thereafter be deemed to be treated as Confidential or Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only under the terms of this Protective Order. 7. No person subject to this Protective Order other than the producing person shall disclosure any of the Discovery Material designated by the producing person as Confidential to

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Precision Medicine Group, LLC v. Blue Matter, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/precision-medicine-group-llc-v-blue-matter-llc-nysd-2020.