Precision Constructors, Inc. v. Valtec Construction, Inc.

913 So. 2d 1272, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18018, 2005 WL 3055178
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 2005·No. No. 3D05-574·Published

Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing Granted

PER CURIAM.

We hereby grant respondent’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion dated July 13, 2005, and substitute the following:

Upon consideration of Valtec’s motion for rehearing, we exercise our discretion to deny Precision’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Dickinson v. Stone, 251 So.2d 268 (Fla.1971)(mandamus is not awarded as a matter of right, but in the exercise of sound judicial discretion); O’Brien v. O.W. Campbell, 118 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)(accord).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Precision Constructors, Inc. v. Valtec Construction, Inc., 913 So. 2d 1272, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18018, 2005 WL 3055178 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

913 So. 2d 1272 (Precision Constructors, Inc. v. Valtec Construction, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dickinson v. Stone
251 So. 2d 268 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
O'Brien v. Campbell
118 So. 2d 672 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)