Precision Castings Co. v. Boland

Second Circuit

Precision Castings Co. v. Boland

85 F.2d 15, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4010

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJuly 13, 1936

DocketNo. 455

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 85 F.2d 15 (Precision Castings Co. v. Boland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Precision Castings Co. v. Boland, 85 F.2d 15, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4010 (2d Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, engaged in the manufacture of die castings in Fayetteville, N. Y., sold them after such manufacture within and without the state of New York. This bill seeks to enjoin the board from proceeding further under the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.) upon complaint alleging that appellant engaged in unfair labor practices in discharging 24 employees because .of their union activity and by refusing to bargain collectively with the representatives of its employees. For the reasons stated in E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Boland (C.C.A.) 85 F.(2d) 12, decided this day, 'the appellant has not shown that any irreparable injury will be suffered if this injunction is denied, and under the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act, it has an adequate, complete, and exclusive remedy at law on a petition to the proper court for a subpoena, or the enforcement or review of any order the board may enter.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, engaged in the manufacture of die castings in Fayetteville, N. Y., sold them after such manufacture within and without the state of New York. This bill seeks to enjoin the board from proceeding further under the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.) upon complaint alleging that appellant engaged in unfair labor practices in discharging 24 employees because .of their union activity and by refusing to bargain collectively with the representatives of its employees. For the reasons stated in E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Boland (C.C.A.) 85 F.(2d) 12, decided this day, 'the appellant has not shown that any irreparable injury will be suffered if this injunction is denied, and under the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act, it has an adequate, complete, and exclusive remedy at law on a petition to the proper court for a subpoena, or the enforcement or review of any order the board may enter.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 F.2d 15, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/precision-castings-co-v-boland-ca2-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack