Prechter v. Lemley

20 So. 1019, 48 La. Ann. 1439, 1896 La. LEXIS 660
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 16, 1896
DocketNo. 12,086
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 20 So. 1019 (Prechter v. Lemley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prechter v. Lemley, 20 So. 1019, 48 La. Ann. 1439, 1896 La. LEXIS 660 (La. 1896).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.

This case presents the same issue as that determined in McConnell vs. Lemley, 48 An. p. 1433. In view of the importance of the question and the earnestness of the argument for plaintiff, in this as well as on the application for the rehearing in the McConnell case, we have given the subject a re-examination. In the light of our jurisprudence, meagre as it is on this question, and that afforded by the French authorities, we are constrained to adhere to our opinion in the McConnell case.'

For the reasons assigned in the opiniou in the case of McConnell, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the lower court be avoided, reversed and annulled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Klein v. Young
111 So. 495 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1926)
Shelton v. Masur
102 So. 813 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)
Boutte v. New Orleans Terminal Co.
72 So. 513 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 So. 1019, 48 La. Ann. 1439, 1896 La. LEXIS 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prechter-v-lemley-la-1896.