Preble v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Preble v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 421 P.3d 674
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 6, 2017·No. SCWC-14-0000531·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000531 05-JUL-2017 01:26 PM

SCWC-14-0000531

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

DAVID PREBLE,

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0000531; S.P.P. NO. 11-1-0054; CR. NO. 99-2362)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant David Preble’s application for writ of certiorari filed on May 25, 2017, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 5, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Preble v. State, (haw 2017).

Preble v. State (Preble v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.