Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. v. Anderson

918 So. 2d 634, 2005 Miss. LEXIS 299, 2005 WL 1118224
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMay 12, 2005
DocketNo. 2004-CA-01293-SCT
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 918 So. 2d 634 (Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. v. Anderson, 918 So. 2d 634, 2005 Miss. LEXIS 299, 2005 WL 1118224 (Mich. 2005).

Opinion

WALLER, Presiding Justice,

for the Court.

¶ 1. This matter is on appeal after a ruling by the Circuit Court of Holmes County granting the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and for declaratory judgment finding that the plaintiffs had no obligation to arbitrate their disputes with the defendants. Having considered the defendants’ appeal (see 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(2) & (3)), we affirm the circuit court because the issues raised have been decided against the defendants in Prepaid Legal Services, Inc. v. Battle, 873 So.2d 79 (Miss.2004). We also remand this matter for further proceedings.

DISCUSSION

¶ 2. Claude Anderson, Jr., and 86 other plaintiffs1 commenced this action against [635]*635Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc., Harlan C. Stoneeipher, Brooks Werkheiser, Dyre Law Firm, PLLC, and Arnold D. Dyre in the Circuit Court of Holmes County, Mississippi. The plaintiffs claimed that PrePaid used deceptive marketing practices to lure them into signing a contract for legal services that was grossly deficient in comparison to the services they were told that they would receive. The plaintiffs sought a partial summary judgment and a declaratory judgment that they were under no obligation to arbitrate any of these claims against the defendants.

¶ 3. The defendants responded that all of the contracts entered into by the plaintiffs contained an arbitration provision in nine point font on the fifth of six pages as follows: “K. Settlement of Disputes: In the event of a dispute, the parties will agree on an impartial attorney who will decide such dispute and that decision will be binding on all parties to such dispute.”

¶ 4. We have considered this exact arbitration clause on four different occasions.2 See Pre-Paid Legal Servs., Inc. v. Battle, 873 So.2d 79 (Miss.2004); Pre-Paid Legal Servs., Inc. v. Brownlow, 874 So.2d 972 (Miss.2004); Dyre Law Firm v. Bradley, 874 So.2d 984 (Miss.2004); Pre-Paid Legal Serve., Inc. v. Mealey, 875 So.2d 1075 (Miss.2004). In each instance, we have held that the contract entered into by the plaintiffs did not have a valid, binding arbitration agreement. Battle, 873 So.2d at 84; Brownlow, 874 So.2d at 972-73; Bradley, 874 So.2d at-986; Mealey, 875 So.2d at 1077..

CONCLUSION

¶ 5. Because the issues raised in the appeal have been resolved in earlier cases, we affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court of Holmes County, Mississippi, and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

¶ 6. AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

SMITH, C.J., EASLEY, CARLSON, GRAVES, DICKINSON AND RANDOLPH, JJ„ CONCUR. COBB, P.J., DISSENTS WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN OPINION. DIAZ, J., NOT PARTICIPATING.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
918 So. 2d 634, 2005 Miss. LEXIS 299, 2005 WL 1118224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pre-paid-legal-services-inc-v-anderson-miss-2005.