Pray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pray v. State

125 So. 3d 229, 2013 WL 611264, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2789

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 20, 2013

DocketNo. 4D12-2665

StatusPublished

This text of 125 So. 3d 229 (Pray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pray v. State, 125 So. 3d 229, 2013 WL 611264, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2789 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence. Appellant has previously challenged his 10-20-life sentence for attempted robbery with a firearm. Appellant has not shown that any manifest injustice results from refusing to reconsider this claim where he is serving a concurrent sentence of the same length on count I and the sentence for count I is legal. State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287, 292 (Fla.2003).

WARNER, STEVENSON and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence. Appellant has previously challenged his 10-20-life sentence for attempted robbery with a firearm. Appellant has not shown that any manifest injustice results from refusing to reconsider this claim where he is serving a concurrent sentence of the same length on count I and the sentence for count I is legal. State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287, 292 (Fla.2003).

WARNER, STEVENSON and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 So. 3d 229, 2013 WL 611264, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pray-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack