Pray v. State

339 So. 2d 1157, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16025
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 9, 1976
DocketNos. CC-148, CC-149
StatusPublished

This text of 339 So. 2d 1157 (Pray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pray v. State, 339 So. 2d 1157, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16025 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are AFFIRMED, but the cause is REMANDED with directions to correct the judgment and sentence forms in order to accurately reflect the defendant entered pleas of nolo contendere to the charges against her. Baxley v. State, 317 So.2d 851 (Fla.App.1st, 1975). The defendant need not be present for these proceedings.

AFFIRMED, but REMANDED to correct the record.

BOYER, C. J., and MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baxley v. State
317 So. 2d 851 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
339 So. 2d 1157, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pray-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.