Pray v. Lagee Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pray v. Lagee Construction Corp.

29 A.D.2d 948, 289 N.Y.S.2d 129, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 948 (Pray v. Lagee Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pray v. Lagee Construction Corp., 29 A.D.2d 948, 289 N.Y.S.2d 129, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, plaintiff appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court,- Queens County, dated respectively November 1, 1966 and January 30, 1967, the former denying his motion to vacate the dismissal of the action because of failure to timely file a statement of readiness and to restore the action to the trial calendar, and the [949]*949latter denying his motion for leave to reargue. Order dated November 1, 1966 affirmed, without costs. The excuse proffered for failure to timely file the statement of readiness is unacceptable (Marzian v. D’Oench, 28 A D 2d 723; Boseo v. De Pitt’s Mountain Lodge, 28 A D 2d 717). Appeal from order dated January 30, 1967 dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (Blades v. Burger N Shake Drive Inn, 28 A D 2d 556; De Fabio v. Nadder Rental Serv., 27 A D 2d 931; Kornstein v. New York Tel. Co., 26 A D 2d 820). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, plaintiff appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court,- Queens County, dated respectively November 1, 1966 and January 30, 1967, the former denying his motion to vacate the dismissal of the action because of failure to timely file a statement of readiness and to restore the action to the trial calendar, and the [949]*949latter denying his motion for leave to reargue. Order dated November 1, 1966 affirmed, without costs. The excuse proffered for failure to timely file the statement of readiness is unacceptable (Marzian v. D’Oench, 28 A D 2d 723; Boseo v. De Pitt’s Mountain Lodge, 28 A D 2d 717). Appeal from order dated January 30, 1967 dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (Blades v. Burger N Shake Drive Inn, 28 A D 2d 556; De Fabio v. Nadder Rental Serv., 27 A D 2d 931; Kornstein v. New York Tel. Co., 26 A D 2d 820). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 948, 289 N.Y.S.2d 129, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pray-v-lagee-construction-corp-nyappdiv-1968.