Pray v. Clinton County

101 A.D.3d 1567, 958 N.Y.2d 230
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2012·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Egan Jr., J.

Counsel for respondent advised this Court at oral argument that, during the pendency of this appeal, the parcels in question were sold at public auction to an unrelated third party. Accordingly, the instant appeal is moot (see Matter of County of Albany [Rossi], 94 AD3d 1164, 1165 [2012]). To the extent that respondent suggests that Supreme Court’s purportedly erroneous interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions falls within the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp, v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]), we are not persuaded. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Mercure, J.P., Rose, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pray v. Clinton County, 101 A.D.3d 1567, 958 N.Y.2d 230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

101 A.D.3d 1567 (Pray v. Clinton County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of County of Broome (Cadore)
212 A.D.3d 1012 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
MatterofCountyofUlster[EREDEnterprisesInc.]
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
In re the Foreclosure of Tax Liens by County of Ulster
121 A.D.3d 111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
GATELY, SUSAN v. GATELY, JAMES
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Gately v. Gately
117 A.D.3d 1490 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Fortunatus v. Clinton County
937 F. Supp. 2d 320 (N.D. New York, 2013)