Praxis Capital, LP v. Gardner

Eighth Circuit

Praxis Capital, LP v. Gardner

329 F. App'x 47

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJuly 16, 2009

DocketNos. 07-3154, 07-3157

StatusPublished

This text of 329 F. App'x 47 (Praxis Capital, LP v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Praxis Capital, LP v. Gardner, 329 F. App'x 47 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, defendants Gerald and Jeremy Gardner appeal the district court’s¹ grant of summary judgment to plaintiff Praxis Capital, L.P. in its diversity action under Missouri law. Following careful review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir.2006) (de novo review of summary judgment); Ahlberg v. Chrysler Corp., 481 F.3d 630, 637 (8th Cir.2007) (abuse-of-discretion review of discovery rulings), we affirm the grant of summary judgment for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, and we find no abuse of discretion in any discovery rulings. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the motion to strike portions of Praxis’s appellate brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, defendants Gerald and Jeremy Gardner appeal the district court’s¹ grant of summary judgment to plaintiff Praxis Capital, L.P. in its diversity action under Missouri law. Following careful review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir.2006) (de novo review of summary judgment); Ahlberg v. Chrysler Corp., 481 F.3d 630, 637 (8th Cir.2007) (abuse-of-discretion review of discovery rulings), we affirm the grant of summary judgment for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, and we find no abuse of discretion in any discovery rulings. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the motion to strike portions of Praxis’s appellate brief.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

329 F. App'x 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/praxis-capital-lp-v-gardner-ca8-2009.