Pratt's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Pratt's Appeal

1 Sadler 12

DecidedOctober 5, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Sadler 12 (Pratt's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pratt's Appeal, 1 Sadler 12 (Pa. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This was an appeal by Lewis and Pratt; but on an intimation that a joint appeal would not lie for several claims, the counsel for the appellants took a non pros as to Lewis, and proceeded as to Pratt only. His claim is for “labor and services performed as clerk and foreman of works at tunnel.” It is clear, under the authorities, that such a claim was not covered by the statute of 1872, nor that of 1883. McMillen v. First Nat. Bank, 1 W. N. C. 55; Allison v. Johnson, 92 Pa. 314.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This was an appeal by Lewis and Pratt; but on an intimation that a joint appeal would not lie for several claims, the counsel for the appellants took a non pros as to Lewis, and proceeded as to Pratt only. His claim is for “labor and services performed as clerk and foreman of works at tunnel.” It is clear, under the authorities, that such a claim was not covered by the statute of 1872, nor that of 1883. McMillen v. First Nat. Bank, 1 W. N. C. 55; Allison v. Johnson, 92 Pa. 314.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Sadler 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pratts-appeal-pa-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack