Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Pratter v. Lascoff

Pratter v. Lascoff

236 A.D. 713
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 236 A.D. 713 (Pratter v. Lascoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pratter v. Lascoff, 236 A.D. 713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Liggett Co. v. Baldridge (278 U. S. 105), by which decision we feel bound, inasmuch as we find no facts or circumstances of substance differentiating the'two eases. All concur, except Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for dismissal of the complaint upon the reasoning contained in the opinion of Lewis, J., in Hauges v. Lascoff (140 Misc. 811). [140 Misc. 211.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Magan Medical Clinic v. Cal. State Bd. of Med. Examiners
249 Cal. App. 2d 124 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Russo v. Hults
45 Misc. 2d 807 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
People v. Schwebel
44 Misc. 2d 1035 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Loblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of Pharmacy
22 Misc. 2d 131 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Welling v. Buck
184 Misc. 322 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.D. 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pratter-v-lascoff-nyappdiv-1932.