Pratt v. Village of Seneca Falls
269 A.D. 731, 54 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3491
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Larkin, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for dismissal of the complaint on the authority of Stakel v. City of Batavia (260 N. Y. 628). (The judgment is for plaintiffs in a negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, MeCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pratt v. Village of Seneca Falls, 269 A.D. 731, 54 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
269 A.D. 731 (Pratt v. Village of Seneca Falls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stakel v. City of Batavia
184 N.E. 122 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)