Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Pratt v. Village of Seneca Falls

Pratt v. Village of Seneca Falls

269 A.D. 731, 54 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3491
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 21, 1945
StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D. 731 (Pratt v. Village of Seneca Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pratt v. Village of Seneca Falls, 269 A.D. 731, 54 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Larkin, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for dismissal of the complaint on the authority of Stakel v. City of Batavia (260 N. Y. 628). (The judgment is for plaintiffs in a negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, MeCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stakel v. City of Batavia
184 N.E. 122 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 731, 54 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pratt-v-village-of-seneca-falls-nyappdiv-1945.