Pratt v. Trustees of Sailors' Snug Harbor

19 Misc. 2d 551, 189 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3592
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 28, 1959·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The tenant affirmed his leases by remaining in possession of his apartment after discovering the alleged fraud and is bound by all the terms of the lease, including the jury waiver provision contained therein. (Leav v. Weitzner, 268 App. Div. 466.) He is therefore not entitled to a jury trial and the [552]*552order denying defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s demand for a trial by jury and striking the action from the Jury Calendar was improperly made.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pratt v. Trustees of Sailors' Snug Harbor, 19 Misc. 2d 551, 189 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3592 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

19 Misc. 2d 551 (Pratt v. Trustees of Sailors' Snug Harbor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Urban Outfitters, Inc. v. 166 Enterprise Corp.
136 F. Supp. 2d 273 (S.D. New York, 2001)
Fay's Drug Co. of Riverside, Inc. v. P & C Property Cooperative, Inc.
51 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)