Pratt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pratt v. State

560 S.W.3d 919

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 13, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106128

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 560 S.W.3d 919 (Pratt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pratt v. State, 560 S.W.3d 919 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Scott Pratt appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error in the motion court's denial of his motion and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Scott Pratt appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error in the motion court's denial of his motion and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

560 S.W.3d 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pratt-v-state-moctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack