Pratt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pratt v. State

560 S.W.3d 919

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 13, 2018·No. No. ED 106128·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Scott Pratt appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error in the motion court's denial of his motion and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Scott Pratt appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error in the motion court's denial of his motion and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Pratt v. State, 560 S.W.3d 919 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

560 S.W.3d 919 (Pratt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related