Pratt v. Pratt

7 Utah 278
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1891
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Utah 278 (Pratt v. Pratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pratt v. Pratt, 7 Utah 278 (Utah 1891).

Opinion

Pek Curiam.

Orson Pratt died in 1881, intestate, and left a large-estate, and many polygamous children, and some legitimate-[279]*279children as well. The question is as to whether the polygamous children should share in the distribution of the estate. The decree of the district court was that none but the legitimate children should inherit. This decree is reversed, and a decree entered that all of the children acknowledged by him as such in his life-time, or proved to be such by satisfactory evidence, shall share in the distribution of the estate. This decision is made on the authority of the case of Cope v. Cope, 137 U. S. 682, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 222, recently decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cope v. Cope
137 U.S. 682 (Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Utah 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pratt-v-pratt-utah-1891.